Skip to content

Ask an Academic

  • Home
  • Ask a Question
  • Contact Us
Law and justice statue

The principle in Centrovincial Estates v Merchant Investors (1983)

September 23, 2019 by AskanAcademic.com

A brief discussion of the facts of Centrovincial Estates v Merchant Investors (1983) and what the court held and why.

Question

What was the main point in the dispute in Centrovincial Estates v Merchant Investors (1983)?

Answer

In this case, the claimant had agreed to let specific premises to the defendants. A letter was sent to the defendants specifying that the current market rental value of the property in question was £65,000. This was then agreed to constitute an offer which the defendants accepted. The offer was in fact made by the claimant’s solicitors and was constructed upon a mistake. The real price that they were supposed to specify in the offer was actually £126,000. The claimants were contacted and the mistake was pointed out. The defendants, nevertheless, stated that the contract had already been concluded and that there was no way for them to have known that the price offered had been a mistake and not the actual price.

The court held that the contract was not rendered void by the mistake, as an objective approach was taken. However, the decision is controversial due to offerees being entitled to create legal rights for themselves by merely accepting an offer, when they have in no way relied upon the offer and also being informed that it was a mistake, not reflecting the intention of the offeror.

The reasoning behind this controversial decision on this occasion is that, if the law were to take into consideration whether there was reliance on promises, then this would result in depriving contractual agreements of stability until they are actually relied upon. This would undermine the essential predictability, contractual stability and certainty that are advanced by the objective approach in its existing state. The objective test here would be, what would have been the intentions of a reasonable person and in this case, mistake was not interpreted as mistake by the offerees.

References

Centrovincial Estates PLC v Merchant Investors Assurance Company Ltd [1983] Com LR 158

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Organizational Behaviour Problems in the Workplace

Next Post:

Why Should the Courts Take a Less Strict Approach When Asked to Lift the Corporate Veil?

Search Q&As

Categories

  • Art Media and Literature (74)
  • Business and Management (256)
  • Computing and ICT (14)
  • Construction and Engineering (35)
  • Education (90)
  • Environmental Sciences (2)
  • Finance and Economics (91)
  • Health (64)
  • Languages (12)
  • Law (88)
  • Mathematics and Statistics (2)
  • Medical Sciences (19)
  • Politics and International Relations (83)
  • Research Methodology (1)
  • Science (49)
  • Social Sciences (101)

Archives

Who We Are

Askanacademic.com is owned and operated by All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Data Controller No: Z1821391.

Registered office:
Venture House
Cross Street
Arnold
Nottingham
NG5 7PJ

Main Navigation

  • Home
  • Ask a Question
  • Contact Us

Legals

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Categories

  • Business and Management
  • Law
  • Finance and Economics
  • Health
An an Academic Logo
© 2023 Ask an Academic | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Reject
Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT