Skip to content

Ask an Academic

  • Home
  • Ask a Question
  • Contact Us
Law and justice statue

The Extent of Employer Vicarious Liability for Employee Criminal Acts

September 20, 2019 by AskanAcademic.com

To what extent does the common law impose vicarious liability upon employers for the criminal actions of their employees?

Question

To what extent does the common law render the employer vicariously liable for the criminal acts of his employee?

Answer

Vicarious liability is a legal doctrine that is rapidly developing, described by Lord Phillips as ‘on the move’. Employers’ tortious liability for employees’ criminal actions is no exception, as evidenced by the UK Supreme Court’s decision in March 2016 in Mohamud v Morrison Supermarkets, regarding a racially-motivated assault by a Morrisons petrol station employee on a customer. Here the Supreme Court confirmed that an employer may be found liable for an employee’s criminal actions, even where an employee was motivated by personal reasons, so long as the ‘close connection’ test is satisfied. This ‘close connection’ test for generally establishing vicarious liability was established in the landmark case of Lister v Hesley Hall, and requires the Court to evaluate the ‘closeness’ of the connection between the employee’s actions, and the actions expected of them in the normal course of duty. The leading judgment in the Morrison case emphasizes analysis of the ‘field of activities’ delegated to the employee and a ‘sufficient connection’ between the employee’s position and their conduct.

Whilst the justification for employers’ vicarious liability has been dismissed by some as part of a larger culture of blame and compensation, it can indeed be considered ‘fair and just’ that those who profit from a business should be liable for issues closely connected to their business. This is particularly so when one understands corrective justice and distributive justice as informing principles of tort law, as legal commentators such as Mullender argue ought be done. From this perspective, it is advantageous to victims in the instant case to be able to sue a party with deeper pockets to help in restoring them to the position they were in prior to the criminal action, as well as advantageous to society in terms of distributing resources in a more societally just fashion.

References

Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] UKSC 56.

Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc [2016] UKSC 11.

A Ohringer, ‘Paying for the mistakes of others: when businesses are liable for their workers’ misconduct’ (2016) 39(26) CSR 214.

Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2002] 1 A.C. 215.

Mohamud v Morrison (n 2).

S.S.H Chan, ‘Hidden departure from the Lister close connection test’ (3 August 2016) LMCLQ 352.

J Martin & T Storey, ‘Unlocking Criminal Law’ (Routledge, 2015) 185.

R Mullender, ‘Corrective Justice, Distributive Justice and the Law of Negligence’ (2001) 17(1) PN J 35.

Post navigation

Previous Post:

The Character of War

Next Post:

How nurses support the emotional impact of reconstructive surgery

Search Q&As

Categories

  • Art Media and Literature (74)
  • Business and Management (256)
  • Computing and ICT (14)
  • Construction and Engineering (35)
  • Education (90)
  • Environmental Sciences (2)
  • Finance and Economics (91)
  • Health (64)
  • Languages (12)
  • Law (88)
  • Mathematics and Statistics (2)
  • Medical Sciences (19)
  • Politics and International Relations (83)
  • Research Methodology (1)
  • Science (49)
  • Social Sciences (101)

Archives

Who We Are

Askanacademic.com is owned and operated by All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Data Controller No: Z1821391.

Registered office:
Venture House
Cross Street
Arnold
Nottingham
NG5 7PJ

Main Navigation

  • Home
  • Ask a Question
  • Contact Us

Legals

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Categories

  • Business and Management
  • Law
  • Finance and Economics
  • Health
An an Academic Logo
© 2023 Ask an Academic | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Reject
Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT