What are the distinctions between primary and secondary victims of psychiatric illness?
A primary victim is a one who could have been in immediate physical danger, but only suffered psychiatric illness (White v CC of South Yorkshire [1999]). It is possible that even if the physical harm did not materialise, a defendant could still be liable to a victim of psychiatric harm (Page v Smith).
Secondary victims are those who were not in any danger of harm but rather become psychiatrically ill due to witnessing the death/injury of an immediate victim in which they have a loving and affectionate relationship with (Alcock v CC of South Yorkshire Police ([1992]).
It is important to note that the psychiatric injury must be a medically recognised condition. Thus, normal grief and distress would be insufficient.
Question: Who is Julian Assange and what are the legal battles he is facing? Answer:…
The Bosman ruling is a landmark 1995 decision by the European Court of Justice (ECJ)…
Can listening to music manifest good luck as suggested on the social media hashtag #manifestationsongs
A Deferred Payment Agreement (DPA) is a financial arrangement, often used in the context of…
The terms "withdrawal," "payout," and "pay out," while related in the context of financial transactions,…
Yes, dissertation / thesis writing services are completely legal in Dubai and the wider UAE.…