Under the law of tort, what are the differences between primary and secondary victims when trying to make a claim for psychiatric injury
What are the distinctions between primary and secondary victims of psychiatric illness?
A primary victim is a one who could have been in immediate physical danger, but only suffered psychiatric illness (White v CC of South Yorkshire ). It is possible that even if the physical harm did not materialise, a defendant could still be liable to a victim of psychiatric harm (Page v Smith).
Secondary victims are those who were not in any danger of harm but rather become psychiatrically ill due to witnessing the death/injury of an immediate victim in which they have a loving and affectionate relationship with (Alcock v CC of South Yorkshire Police ().
It is important to note that the psychiatric injury must be a medically recognised condition. Thus, normal grief and distress would be insufficient.