Can the part payment of a debt amount to sufficient consideration in contract law and form a binding agreement?
Consideration is a key component of a legally binding contract, usually defined as a benefit to one party, and a detriment to the other.
The common law rule confirmed in in Foakes v Beer (1883) is that the part-payment of a debt will not amount to sufficient consideration. Take the following example:
Party A has contracted with Party B for the purchase of a car at the cost of £5,000. Party A offers to pay £4,000 instead, two weeks earlier than the due date of the £5,000. Party B agrees to take the £4,000 and will not demand the remaining £1,000.
Following Foakes v Beer, this promise is not enforceable, and Party B can demand the remaining £1,000 despite promising not to. The reason behind this position is to prevent the exploitation of parties in poor financial positions, as shown here:
Party A owes Party B £1,000, but is aware Party B is in dire financial need of £500. With this knowledge, Party A can offer £500 as part-payment of the debt if Party B waive the remaining £500, knowing that Party B have no choice but to accept the money.
The case which developed the rule, Pinnels Case (1602), established some limited exceptions:
Foakes v Beer [1884] UKHL 1
Pinnel’s Case [1602] 5 Co. Rep. 117a
Question: Who is Julian Assange and what are the legal battles he is facing? Answer:…
The Bosman ruling is a landmark 1995 decision by the European Court of Justice (ECJ)…
Can listening to music manifest good luck as suggested on the social media hashtag #manifestationsongs
A Deferred Payment Agreement (DPA) is a financial arrangement, often used in the context of…
The terms "withdrawal," "payout," and "pay out," while related in the context of financial transactions,…
Yes, dissertation / thesis writing services are completely legal in Dubai and the wider UAE.…