Skip to content

Ask an Academic

  • Home
  • Ask a Question
  • Contact Us
Crowd of people

Non-scientific research is argumentative and can lead to conflict. Discuss

September 24, 2019 by AskanAcademic.com

Non-scientific research is argumentative and can lead to conflict. Discuss

Question

Non-scientific research is argumentative and can lead to conflict. Discuss

Answer

Non-scientific research is that which uses means including intuition, reflection, experience and belief in order to determine conclusions (Potter, 2000). This contrasts with scientific research, which proves or disproves hypotheses using established methodologies (Potter, 2000).
Scientific research is typically replicable, unlike non-scientific research (Potter, 2000). This is not say, however, that non-scientific research is of no value: indeed, it is capable of developing meaning and depth, and much of Freud’s psychological research was conducted using non-scientific means (Guttmann and Scholz-Strasser, 1988). Frankl (1988) notes, however, that Freud’s findings differed appreciably from those of other psychologists to the extent that psychologists argue about them to this day, and adhere to various “schools.”
The indication from the discipline of psychology is that non-scientific research is, indeed, argumentative and capable of provoking conflict. A contemporary example that illustrates how non-scientific research provokes argument leading to conflict may be found in the current fashionable notion of “intelligent design,” a pseudo-science that attempts to reconcile fundamentalist Christian theology with Darwinian evolution (Boudry, Blanke and Braeckman, 2010). This primarily U.S. phenomenon, despite its attempt to accommodate Christianity and Darwinism, has provoked argument and conflict within the scientific, religious and political spheres largely due to its non-scientific basis in narrow belief, tradition and personal intuition (Potter, 2000).
Thoughtful non-scientific research, such as ethnography, acknowledges its argumentative nature whilst conceding that argument has a role to play in research (Potter, 2000). Conclusions drawn from traditional beliefs, intuition, reflection and experience may in isolation be found to be unreliable and invalid: however, argument about them offers researchers opportunities to discover new perspectives, meaning and depth. Arising conflict, however, may be less fruitful.

References

Boudry, M., Blanke, S. and Braeckman, J. (2010) “Irreducible incoherence and intelligent design: a look into the conceptual toolbox of a pseudoscience” in The Quarterly Review of Biology, 85 (4), pp. 473-482

Frankl, V. (1988) The Will to Meaning, London: Penguin

Guttmann, G. and Scholz-Strasser, I. (1988) Freud and the Neurosciences, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences

Potter, G. (1000) The Philosophy of Social Science, Abingdon: Routledge

Post navigation

Previous Post:

Previous Post

Next Post:

What is pedagogy?

Search Q&As

Categories

  • Art Media and Literature (73)
  • Business and Management (256)
  • Computing and ICT (14)
  • Construction and Engineering (35)
  • Education (90)
  • Environmental Sciences (2)
  • Finance and Economics (91)
  • Health (64)
  • Languages (12)
  • Law (88)
  • Mathematics and Statistics (2)
  • Medical Sciences (19)
  • Politics and International Relations (83)
  • Research Methodology (1)
  • Science (49)
  • Social Sciences (101)

Related Posts

  • Research philosophy: positivism
  • International Sports and War
  • Is the distinction of social classes essential to a society’s stability? How can Marxist theory be used to justify so?

Archives

Who We Are

Askanacademic.com is owned and operated by All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Data Controller No: Z1821391.

Registered office:
Venture House
Cross Street
Arnold
Nottingham
NG5 7PJ

Main Navigation

  • Home
  • Ask a Question
  • Contact Us

Legals

  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Categories

  • Business and Management
  • Law
  • Finance and Economics
  • Health
An an Academic Logo
© 2021 Ask an Academic | WordPress Theme by Superb Themes
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Reject
Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.